Use Quetzal to find answers

Up to 30% of R&D money is wasted rediscovering published information. A leading reason National Institutes of Health (NIH) proposals fail is missed references (hence proposing work that isn't actually new).

Aren't you ready for a smarter search RESULTS engine?

There are huge differences in search engines. Consider the following two examples that compare legacy search engines to Quetzal® Search and Communication, the world's only Quantum Logic Linguistic™ search engine: (1) Try searching for NO in your favorite search engine. NO is, of course, nitric oxide and many articles only use "NO" and not "nitric oxide". Plus, there are other names for this important molecule.

Here are some example results:

• PubMed: 0 items found
• GoPubMed: 0 documents found (even with semantics)
• Google Scholar: Messy results: NO as author initials, No. means number, and other noise
• Quetzal: Relevant references, including finding all synonyms for NO

Watch this short video or download the PDF for more.

Intrigued by these examples? Now just imagine Quetzal helping you find relevant results for the topics you are interested in, along with:

• Being able to answer questions (such as what genes are relevant to diabetes), seeing the papers, and having a list of those genes
• Finding relevant documents not only from PubMed, but also NIH Grants, Toxline, AHRQ Treatment Protocols, Patent Grants and Applications, and more, including full-text searching
• Having free access to over 10 million PDFs with a single click (or connect to your library's holdings for the rest)

To learn more, watch this five-minute video

Can you risk your career on legacy search engines? Interested? Try Quetzal® Search and Communication. Contact Christopher Burke, burke@amigos.org or 800-843-8482, ext. 2805.